Mookherjee, Nayanika and Rapport, Nigel and Josephides, Lisette and Hage, Ghassan and Todd, Lindi Renier and Cowlishaw, Gillian (2009) Ethics of apology : a set of commentaries. Critique of Anthropology, 29 (3). pp. 345-366. ISSN 1460-3721Full text not available from this repository.
On 13 February 2008, the Australian government apologized to the ‘stolen generations’: those children of Aboriginal descent who were removed from their parents (usually their Aboriginal mothers) to be raised in white foster-homes and institutions administered by government and Christian churches — a practice that lasted from before the First World War to the early 1970s. This apology was significant, in the words of Rudd, for the ‘healing’ of the Australian nation. Apologizing for past injustices has become a significant speech act in current times. Why does saying sorry seem to be ubiquitous at the moment? What are the instances of not saying sorry? What are the ethical implications of this era of remembrance and apology? This set of commentaries seeks to explore some of the ethical, philosophical, social and political dimensions of this Age of Apology. The authors discuss whether apology is a responsibility which cannot — and should not — be avoided; the ethical pitfalls of seeking an apology, or not uttering it; the global and local understandings of apology and forgiveness; and the processes of ownership and appropriation in saying sorry.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Critique of Anthropology|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Aboriginal communities • apology • collective and historical responsibility • forgiveness • racism • sorry • truth and reconciliation|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HM Sociology|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Deposited By:||Mr Richard Ingham|
|Deposited On:||27 Nov 2009 14:22|
|Last Modified:||18 Jan 2017 01:36|
Actions (login required)