Taylor, Paul J. and Thomas, Sally (2008) Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1 (3). pp. 263-281. ISSN 1750-4708
This is the latest version of this item.
|PDF (1.pdf) |
Download (316Kb) | Preview
This research examined the relationship between Linguistic Style Matching—the degree to which negotiators coordinate their word use—and negotiation outcome. Nine hostage negotiations were divided into 6 time stages and the dialogue of police negotiators and hostage takers analyzed across 18 linguistic categories. Correlational analyses showed that successful negotiations were associated with higher aggregate levels of Linguistic Style Matching (LSM) than unsuccessful negotiations. This result was due to dramatic fluctuations of LSM during unsuccessful negotiations, with negotiators unable to maintain the constant levels of rapport and coordination that occurred in successful negotiations. A further analysis of LSM at the local turn-by-turn level revealed complex but organized variations in behavior across outcome. In comparison to unsuccessful negotiations, the dialogue of successful negotiations involved greater coordination of turn taking, reciprocation of positive affect, a focus on the present rather than the past, and a focus on alternatives rather than on competition.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Negotiation and Conflict Management Research|
|Additional Information:||This is a pre-print of an article published in Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 1 (3) 2008. (c) Wiley.|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Departments:||Faculty of Science and Technology > Psychology|
|Deposited By:||Dr Paul Taylor|
|Deposited On:||18 Aug 2009 08:59|
|Last Modified:||26 May 2016 00:00|
Available Versions of this Item
- Linguistic Style Matching and Negotiation Outcome. (deposited 29 Jul 2008 11:43)
- Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. (deposited 18 Aug 2009 08:59)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)