Lynch, Michael and McNally, Ruth (2005) "Science", "sens commun" et preuve ADN:une controverse judiciaire a propos de la comprehension publique de la science. Droit et Societe, 61. pp. 655-681. ISSN 0769-3362Full text not available from this repository.
This paper examines the English case, Regina v Adams in which the difference between "scientific reason" and "common sense" was explicitly at stake in the use of DNA evidence. In its decision the Appellate Court reinstated a boundary between "scientific" and "common sense" evidence, arguing that this boundary was necessary to preserve the jury's role as trier of fact. The paper's discussion of the court's work of demarcation addresses the unresolved problems with the place of probability estimates in jury trials.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Droit et Societe|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Bayesian analysis ; Boundary work ; Criminal law ; DNA Profiling ; Probability|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Deposited By:||Dr Ruth McNally|
|Deposited On:||02 Mar 2009 14:33|
|Last Modified:||26 Jul 2012 16:27|
Actions (login required)