Lancaster EPrints

I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'.

Tate, Andrew W. (2004) I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'. Glass, 16. pp. 14-30.

Full text not available from this repository.
Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Glass
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PE English
Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > English & Creative Writing
ID Code: 24140
Deposited By: ep_ss_importer
Deposited On: 02 Mar 2009 11:49
Refereed?: Yes
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 26 Jul 2012 16:21
Identification Number:
URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/24140

Actions (login required)

View Item