Lancaster EPrints

PCDD/Fs in Norwegian and UK soils: implications for sources and environmental cycling.

Hassanin, Ashraf and Lee, Robert G. M. and Steinnes, Eiliv and Jones, Kevin C. (2005) PCDD/Fs in Norwegian and UK soils: implications for sources and environmental cycling. Environmental Science and Technology, 39 (13). pp. 4784-4792. ISSN 0013-936X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper presents data on polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in a set of well-characterized, undisturbed surface (0−5 cm) and subsurface background soils from the U.K. and Norway. The soils have been used previously to investigate the latitudinal distribution, fractionation, cold condensation, and “hopping” of other classes of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The mono- to octa-CDD/F homologues were quantified. Woodland soils contained higher concentrations (on a dry and soil organic matter (SOM)-basis) than grassland soils, consistent with previous studies. The absolute concentrations of all the PCDDs and most of the PCDFs significantly decreased with latitude, generally supporting the idea of a “southern source region” and a “remote/receiving northern region”. There was little evidence of “fractionation” and minimal influence of PCDD/F “hopping” on PCDD/F distribution. The %SOM content had a rather minor influence on soil PCDD/F composition. These findings contrast with the trends seen in these soils for hexachlorobenzene (HCB), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Possible reasons for these differences are discussed and may include influences of/proximity to diffusive combustion sources and/or sources of variable homologue emissions, formation/conversion processes for PCDD/Fs in soils, or strong soil−PCDD/F partitioning. These soils, from regionally remote/ background locations in Europe contained between 0.2 and 78 pg ΣTEQ/g DW. Some therefore exceed recommended levels of contamination for certain land uses by some European countries. These recommendations seem unrealistic and prohibitively restrictive in light of the dataset presented here.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Environmental Science and Technology
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Departments: Faculty of Science and Technology > Lancaster Environment Centre
ID Code: 21252
Deposited By: ep_ss_importer
Deposited On: 24 Dec 2008 11:17
Refereed?: No
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 09 Apr 2014 20:25
Identification Number:
URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/21252

Actions (login required)

View Item