Palladino, Paolo (2003) The Politics of Death:On Life after the ‘End of History'. Journal for Cultural Research, 7 (3). pp. 321-335. ISSN 1479-7585
This is the latest version of this item.
|PDF (Politics_of_Death.pdf) |
Download (180Kb) | Preview
In this paper, the most recent writings by Giorgio Agamben and Bruno Latour are brought into dialog by examining what light they shed on contemporary debates concerning “end of life” decisions. More specifically, the paper focuses on the debates sparked by Diane Pretty's request for a grant of immunity against legal prosecution if her husband were to assist her to commit suicide and so terminate her increasingly unbearable suffering from motor neurone disease. The aim of this exercise is to articulate the presuppositions informing two influential and radically opposed views on the contemporary reconfiguration of relationships between humans, animals and other non-humans.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal for Cultural Research|
|Subjects:||D History General and Old World > D History (General)|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > History|
|Deposited By:||Dr Paolo Palladino|
|Deposited On:||17 Nov 2008 13:02|
|Last Modified:||13 Jan 2016 11:05|
Available Versions of this Item
- The Politics of Death:On Life after the ‘End of History'. (deposited 17 Nov 2008 13:02)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)