Jessop, Bob (2003) Critical Realism and Hegemony: Hic Rhodus, Hic Saltus. Journal of Critical Realism, 1 (2). pp. 183-194.
|PDF (E-2003e_Joseph-Review.pdf) |
Download (54Kb) | Preview
This is a recent contribution to the Routledge series Studies in Critical Realism. Jonathan Joseph, its author, aims to develop Gramsciâ��s celebrated analysis of hegemony in a critical realist direction by distinguishing analytically between â��structural hegemonyâ�� and hegemonic projects and then connecting them dialectically. He develops this approach through a critical engagement not only with Gramsciâ��s work but also with other positions and debates within classical Marxism, Western Marxism, and post-Marxism. The intended result is a â��theory of hegemony [that] combines the political moment of agency with the structural nature of social reproductionâ�� (161). He illustrates his arguments with observations on a range of historical conjunctural analyses drawn from classical Marxism (i.e., Lenin and Trotsky) and Western Marxism (notably the Anderson-Nairn thesis on the peculiarities of British development) and, for his contemporary analyses, from the development of Fordism and the state in post-war Britain in the context of globalization. And he concludes with the view that the Leninist theory of the vanguard party can be grounded in a critical realist understanding of the heterogeneity and complexity of capitalist social formations.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Critical Realism|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Critical realism ; hegemony ; Jonathan Joseph|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HM Sociology|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Sociology|
Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences
|Deposited By:||Professor Bob Jessop|
|Deposited On:||07 Jun 2006|
|Last Modified:||07 Jan 2015 13:02|
Actions (login required)