Mauthe, Barbara (2006) Public law, knowledge and explanation: a critique on the facilitative nature of public law analysis. International Journal of Law in Context, 2 (4). pp. 377-392. ISSN 1744-5523Full text not available from this repository.
The aim of this paper is to examine why public law is able to incorporate political theory but excludes feminist critiques. In order to achieve this goal a form of discourse analysis will be undertaken using epistemological and scientific perceptions of knowledge and explanation. This approach is both unusual and unique but will illustrate some of the exclusionary suppositions which underpin analysis within public law. The paper will conclude that only by adopting an alternative starting point for analysis, such as the use of concepts, will public law be able to incorporate alternative and critical approaches.
|Journal or Publication Title:||International Journal of Law in Context|
|Additional Information:||The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Journal of Law in Context, 2 (4), pp 377-392 2006, © 2006 Cambridge University Press.|
|Subjects:||K Law > KD England and Wales|
|Departments:||Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Law School|
|Deposited By:||Dr Barbara Mauthe|
|Deposited On:||01 Feb 2008 12:18|
|Last Modified:||27 Feb 2017 00:01|
Actions (login required)