Lancaster EPrints

Offeree silence and contractual agreement.

Austen-Baker, Richard (2006) Offeree silence and contractual agreement. Common Law World Review, 35 (4). pp. 247-267. ISSN 1473-7795

[img]
Preview
PDF (23244970_(2).pdf)
Download (92Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This article considers the mechanics of acceptance in the law of contract, focusing on the question of whether the silence of an offeree can effect acceptance. It finds the rule in Felthouse v Bindley (1862) alive and well, but creating problems for judges anxious to find agreements in place. The article considers whether there is, as sometimes suggested, a ‘duty to speak’ and dismisses this, along with any other supposed exceptions to the rule, concluding that silence cannot effect acceptance, but that conduct can do so unless an offeree ‘speaks’ to contradict inevitable inferences from conduct. The article also argues that acceptance as such is not required for agreement, but rather the communication of apparent acceptance is the required element which, taken together with an offer, forms an agreement.

    Item Type: Article
    Journal or Publication Title: Common Law World Review
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Contracts ; Offer and acceptance ; Silence
    Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
    Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Law School
    ID Code: 1132
    Deposited By: Dr Richard Austen-Baker
    Deposited On: 01 Feb 2008 09:54
    Refereed?: Yes
    Published?: Published
    Last Modified: 26 Feb 2013 10:59
    Identification Number:
    URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1132

    Actions (login required)

    View Item