Lancaster EPrints

Offeree silence and contractual agreement.

Austen-Baker, Richard (2006) Offeree silence and contractual agreement. Common Law World Review, 35 (4). pp. 247-267. ISSN 1473-7795

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This article considers the mechanics of acceptance in the law of contract, focusing on the question of whether the silence of an offeree can effect acceptance. It finds the rule in Felthouse v Bindley (1862) alive and well, but creating problems for judges anxious to find agreements in place. The article considers whether there is, as sometimes suggested, a ‘duty to speak’ and dismisses this, along with any other supposed exceptions to the rule, concluding that silence cannot effect acceptance, but that conduct can do so unless an offeree ‘speaks’ to contradict inevitable inferences from conduct. The article also argues that acceptance as such is not required for agreement, but rather the communication of apparent acceptance is the required element which, taken together with an offer, forms an agreement.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Common Law World Review
Uncontrolled Keywords: Contracts ; Offer and acceptance ; Silence
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
Departments: Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences > Law School
ID Code: 1132
Deposited By: Dr Richard Austen-Baker
Deposited On: 01 Feb 2008 09:54
Refereed?: Yes
Published?: Published
Last Modified: 29 Sep 2016 00:00
Identification Number:
URI: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1132

Actions (login required)

View Item